Spurs fans

Culture, Spurs and the Community. And Manboobs. An Interview With Mark Perryman

/ Alan / 4 Comments

I grew up in an era when the t-shirt was a powerful means of individual cultural expression. The iconic image of Brando or Dean in a plain white tee gave way to the sixties counter-culture and revolution, at least at weekends, and the message shirts of the late seventies and eighties.

These days they are mostly mobile advertising for companies who convince punters to actually pay for the privilege of parading the latest brand name down your local high street. Recently two symbols of my glory days, Che and the Ramones, appear on mass-produced shirts available in Peacocks and Madhouse and thence to the chests of young people who may dimly who they are but certainly have no sense of what they stand for. The perfect sign of the times, perhaps, a post-modern appropriation of counter culture symbolic of our politically neutered society. Or mindless cheap tat.

However, some time ago I slipped back into t-shirts after finding one that expressed exactly how I feel. On the front, ‘The game is about glory, doing things in style’, on the back, ‘Blanchflower 4’. It’s torn and faded now but I can’t bear to part with it. Blanchflower’s quote has become a classic to the point of being over-used but I make no apologies: this is the absolute essence of being a Spurs fan and the first time I ever saw it was on this shirt, made by Philosophy Football. Not surprisingly the co-founder, Mark Perryman, is a Spurs fan.

“Blanchflower was the second or third shirt we ever did,” he told me. “He had sadly passed away and that great fanzine the Spur ran a feature that included

Philosophy Football's strictly unofficial T-shirt from http://www.philosophyfootball.com

that extraordinary quote.”

These days Philosophy Football has over 40 designs but the company came from humble origins. Like many of us, Mark and couple of friends came up with a fanciful idea after a match. The difference is, he did something about it.

“In October ’94 after a particularly dull home nil nil draw with QPR, we invited a Rangers friend of ours to White Hart Lane and took him out for something to eat afterwards. After the game we had 10 or 20 minutes to kill. I’d videoed a programme about the philosophy of goalkeeping – Eric Thorsvedt was on it and quoted Camus: ‘All that I know most surely about morality and obligations I owe to football.”

He continues, “Somewhere over Stamford Hill a blinding flash of inspiration found its way into our back bedroom. Someone said to turn it into a t-shirt, my instant response was, it’s got to be a goalkeepers jersey.”

A few shirts for friends became 150 that sold out by Christmas by word of mouth only. Other designs gradually followed but it remained a hobby. I imagined I was dealing with a professional concern, then I spotted the address was a residential street that I cut through on my route to the Lane. Mark chuckled at the memory: ‘It paid for my season ticket and away trips. Friends were coming round and packing them in the back garden on a Saturday morning. We stored them in the bath! At Christmas we would nick a Tescos trolley and make 20 trips a day to Stamford Hill post office. We gave the staff a shirt each by way of thanks.”

These days their annual sales run to 5 figures but Mark stays close to his roots. “It earns us a living but we do it because we love it. If Philosophy Football wasn’t selling me shirts, I’d have to go and find a company where I could buy shirts like this. Go into the Spurs Shop, they have hundreds of products and nothing I would ever want to buy. It’s commercialised and tacky, I’m not walking around advertising a company I’ve never heard of where the logo takes up more space than the club badge.”

Remaining playful rather than po-faced, many of the shirts show the significance of football in society, and do so with a concise wit and intelligence.

Class consciousness (“Emancipation of their class appears to them a foolish dream. It is football which moves them and to which their material means are devoted.”) sits alongside a diverse group of philosophers, footballers, Monty Python and Bob Marley: “Football is a part of I. When I play the world wakes up around me.” Cricket has recently taken its place alongside a number of contemporary political causes, plus shirts that just look tasteful.

The latest offering, from Bobby Smith, is timely not only because it ties in with the 50th anniversary of the Double but also as it addresses the concerns many of us have about the modern game. Under the Double team line up runs the quote: ““Today they play for the money. We played for the glory.”

There’s no doubt these shirts do make connections. People have a story that goes with them. Mine is when I was in London about 15 years ago, when football apparel was not the huge industry it is now. A woman asked why I was wearing a Brazil-style shirt with Pele on the back and the slogan on the front: ‘Football – it’s the beautiful game’. I replied that in Britain we loved Pele and Brazilian football. The woman was close to tears, ‘I am from Brazil I travel all this way, you know my country and my country’s football.’

Mark added that a recent shirt celebrating the role of Polish airmen in the Battle of Britain brought similarly tearful contact from a young Polish woman, amazed and grateful that her countrymen were remembered. Their most high profile affiliation is with the Hope Not Hate campaign against the BNP. “If we lose a few racist customers for our football shirts, then I’m not particularly bothered to be honest,” Mark firmly concludes.

Like many of the sources of his quotes,Mark is himself a deep thinker about the game and its place in contemporary society. He’s a West Stand season ticket holder and also represents England supporters abroad. I wondered if the Philosophy Football approach led to charges of over-intellectualising the game. The image comes to mind of the Fast Show character, sitting delightfully in Highbury, where else, with his hamper and wine. Mark shrugs this off and quotes Cryuff that ‘football is a game you play with your brain’ (available on a t-shirt, naturally), citing Van der Vaart, Klinsmann, Modric and Ardilles as examples of the benefits of a cosmopolitan approach to your football.

He warms to his theme. “I resolutely reject the whole idea of the bourgeoisification of football. If you go to any away game, Spurs or England, it’s resolutely a working class culture. That’s not to say tickets aren’t more expensive than they deserve to be. Much more serious is the corporatisation of football. I sit in the West Stand listening to the accents, the people spending 1k plus on their season ticket are from an upper working or lower middle class background. It’s obvious people are making sacrifices.”

He’s right. As prices rise, I cut back on other things because the club is so much a part of my life. Football accounts for over 90% of my expenditure on leisure – I just don’t do other things in order to get to Spurs. Exorbitant prices contribute to the rise in the average age of fans. Young fans attend a few games a season, watching the rest on Sky. Mark does not fully agree. “The problem of who does and does not go to football is not so much the price, although that is an issue, it’s access to tickets. New fans can’t get one for the big games that everyone wants to go to.”

The increased capacity of the new stadium would help in this respect but, speaking before the Stratford bid, Mark presciently identified the worrying issue of how the club is drifting away from its roots and its locality.

“I’ve lived in Tottenham since 86. I cycle to the ground and I’m home in 15 minutes but the club doesn’t address the fact that it’s no longer a north London

If you are feeling militant...

club. There’s no real obvious presence there from people from the locality. In fact when I hear people chatting about Tottenham where I sit it’s pretty obvious most people don’t  particularly like the area. They’ve moved away to Herts or Essex or Kent or Sussex, moved away and moved up in the world, in life.”

This phenomenon isn’t unique to Spurs, rather, it’s the case throughout London. “West Ham as an east end family club, bollocks, it’s a club of south Essex”.

I mention Spurs interest in the community – they do a lot of work in my field, social care- but Mark remains unconvinced: “I like to see Spurs take more seriously work in the community but most is selling half term coaching courses to middle class children in Essex. They don’t actually do anything in the borough of any significance. I fear that if they get the new ground that connection with the locality will become even more distant.” He cites our Islington neighbours as an example, where more people than ever before come from outside the locality and which he describes as ‘becoming a destination rather than a team.”

From a tasteful way to cover up your manboobs to the sharpest critique of a club’s place in its community that I have heard this year, the last word firmly takes us back to our roots. Mark needs the help of TOMM readers. “We would love to do a Dave Mackay shirt to tie in with the Double. Years ago I read a quote, maybe about the football being a diamond, but I can’t find it anywhere.” Over to you.

For more about Philosophy Football click here




Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine

Spurs v Liverpool

/ Alan / 11 Comments

 

Aaron Lennon’s injury time winner provided a welcome and unexpected burst of adrenalin at the end of a match defined by errors. It had no place in a stuttering second half Spurs display, but the exhilaration of his mad dash and fine finish was entirely in keeping with an astonishing week at the Lane. Beating L’arse, 5th in the league, in the knock-out stages of the Champions League. With a game to spare. It’s all downhill from here.

 

I say ‘downhill’ in order to get a cheap ironic snigger. It’s not worth even that, I’ll settle for a stifled chortle. But the reality is, and I’m already digressing, second paragraph in, so stay with me, in reality we’ve accomplished all this without coming close to our best team. Yesterday our 5th choice centre-half, stood next to our 4th, was replaced by the 6th choice. Two in-form central midfielders were both out, our right winger’s been off the pace lately while our centre forwards have both been criticised for their lack of ability, never mind lack of league goals. If we had accomplished what has been straightforward for most of their opponents this season and beaten the hammeroids and Wigan, we’d be second, level on points with Man U. The truly astonishing thought is not where we are but what this team is capable of.

 

As so often this season, Spurs did their utmost at times to keep that potential hidden. A bright opening gave way to a series of increasingly frustrating periods when we almost put it all together, but not quite. Chances were few and far between once VDV went off (give him a rest and let him fully recover) and we continually gave the ball away. Once again an opposing team comes to the Lane, not in the best of form, and finds that all they have to do is sit back and wait, because sooner or later, usually sooner, we’ll just give it to them.

 

Poor Palacios was the main but not the only culprit. He bears the whole world on his shoulders, judging by his demeanour. We’ll never know how much the sickening death of his brother has taken from him but at times it is as if it’s ripped out his soul. He looks a long way from home. His heart, however, remains intact, bless him. Throughout a poor 90 minutes, with missed passes and tackles galore, to his eternal credit he kept coming back for more. Never giving up is as much as we could expect yesterday, more than many players in his circumstances would have offered and frankly more than the fans in the East Stand who jeered him deserved.

 

Losing possession kept Liverpool in the game. Chances for VDV and then Defoe were blocked – for once a mindless JD blast would have done the trick but he kept it down and unerringly found the defender. Defoe looked sharp at this point, moving well across the line and unafraid to take the ball early, a volley didn’t come off but it was on target and showed a confidence that will bring goals in the future. JD does well when he comes back from injury – unfortunately we’ve had plenty of chances to evidence this. Not the greatest student of the game, a period of enforced reflection improves his movement and team-play. He’s not a thinker so needs his instincts to be sharp but that’s not quite enough in the Premier League.

 

As it was, our early promise faded and by half time it was a relief that we were down by a single goal only. Although Liverpool will be kicking themselves, especially given the denouement, Spurs defence deserves some credit. Bassong’s superb tackle to dispossess Torres in the act of shooting was matched only by a similar effort early in the second half. The Torres of last season would have surely scored or at the very least got his shot away, but he’s a pale shadow of the classiest striker in Europe that we took such pleasure in enjoying last season. I’m glad he did nothing yesterday but there’s no joy in seeing such a fine footballer in the doldrums.

 

Maxi had the best opportunity but again Gomes didn’t commit himself too early and made it as difficult as possible. Not that difficult, though. The goal when it came was scrappy, a ball that perhaps we should have cleared but it fell to Skirtel. For the rest of the game, we defended well. Gallas was excellent again, snuffing out attacks with well-timed excursions from the safety of the back four. His body and mind are fully functioning now and he’s on top form. Bassong did well too, given his lack of recent first team experience. His tackling was extremely poised, considering that he clearly wasn’t ready to come on, let alone warmed up. That lack of readiness could have cost us, it’s inexcusable. Kaboul had been down for a while and straight away the players signalled for a sub. Kaboul once again demonstrated his talent and I hope this latest in a series of pulls and strains does not indicate that his giant body and athleticism are not at odds with each other.

 

For the second week in succession we get a penalty from a handball in the wall. I’ve not seen any replays of the match but Liverpool were incandescent. They were similarly furious when BAE pulled down a player, looked a pen to me. Defoe has missed 5 out of the last 6 penalties he’s taken. This one went unerringly and firmly past the post.

 

We were on top at this point: Liverpool played some neat football and worked hard but never closed us down so we were always in with a chance. Nevertheless we were intent on throwing this all away when at last Modric, who had a good game but tired (injured? He was limping) in the last 15 minutes, picked up the ball and ran at a defence hamstrung by several bookings. A brilliant piece of opportunism, we should have done more of this. It forced the own goal but surprisingly did not turn the game. We steadfastly refused to take full advantage of opponents who were clearly rocking at that moment.

 

After a good first half, Lennon had seen so little of the ball in the second period, he must have been particularly glad of his woolly gloves. Again we should have made more of his ability to run at defenders softened up by bookings for fouls on Luka and Bale but he relies on people giving him the ball if he’s out wide. Under Jol he used to come inside to great effect. He should go and get it more when our game is in need of a boost. Then suddenly it’s a long ball, down the middle, Liverpool are thinking of the lovely warm bath, Radox perhaps, ummmm Mountain Stream or Woodland Glade, either would be nice – oh. Great to see those little legs twinkling again, just a blur, arms outstretched, and a fine finish.

 

Bale came out on top of his fascinating battle with Johnson. Against one of the quickest full backs around, Bale created a number of opportunities. Again we saw the danger when he came inside. I’m sure opposing teams believe that most of their work is done when he comes off his wing into the crowded midfield but he can get through anything, it seems, one particularly thrilling run in the first half.

 

I hope he has a good make of shinguards because he must be the most fouled player in the league. Superboy needs shins of steel. It’s not so long ago when players did not have to wear shinpads at all. When I was 10 or 11, full-back in the mighty Oaklands Road Primary School XI, I picked up a canny tip from ex-pros. The Charlie Buchan Football Monthly revealed that paperback books provided protection that was as good as pads, and no expenditure, just a quick trip to the bookshelf.

 

I had the perfect solution. My dad in the loving pursuit of a good education for his only boy had subscribed to one of these monthly part by part works, the Countries of the World. The books were A5, not too thick, so ideal for my purpose. In the dressing room I quietly, without fanfare but nevertheless with the assurance of a gnarled old pro, produced the books, no doubt to the hushed admiration of my team-mates and took the field against St Josephs with Albania down my left leg and Australia down the right. We lost 8-0, my winger got a hat-trick.

 

Whilst it’s tiresome conceding so often, it’s been a great week so excuse me if for once I impart a positive spin on the stats. Spurs have won twice as many points from games when we conceded first than when we opened the scoring and we have now recouped 16 points from losing positions. Thanks to that nice OptaJoe on twitter for the figures but the commentary is the most significant point. The latter is more than our total in the whole of last season, a season when I bemoaned our lack of resilience. Things are different now. We’re learning how to fight, to play to the last whistle, to chase lost causes . Just think of how good we could be if we didn’t need a comeback every game. Astonishing.

TOMM supports the We Are N17 campaign group to keep Spurs in Tottenham. Here’s their site, I’ll keep you up to date with the campaign and update with my own thoughts later this week.

 

 

 

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to FurlAdd to Newsvine

Life Is Sweet

/ Alan / 12 Comments

Late into the evening I was still spinning and swooning. Head in a whirl, words jumbling, much to the annoyance of nearest and dearest. My heart and head were in a better place.

Kaboul’s twisted gymnastic header was a loop tape in my brain. This gawky young buck produced a sublime moment of contorted grace that’s running still. Always a fine prospect, I’ve praised his determination this season to take the opportunity bestowed upon him by our casualty list but when I talked about taking chances, this wasn’t quite what I had in mind.

The camera was right in line but so outrageous was this comeback, even Fabianski’s despairing dive (oh that phrase feels so damn good, ‘Fabianski’s despairing dive’) and the bulging of the net was not enough, for a second or two at least. Disbelieving, I rose slowly, then the dancing began. Stupid drunk uncle at a wedding dancing, round the living room, into the garden and back again.

Over the years friends and acquaintances have wondered what I see in football, or what anyone sees in it for that matter. For some reason I give the impression of retiring home each night to sip a vintage merlot whilst reading Proust and listening to classical music. Conversations take different forms but usually begin with something about ‘you don’t seem like that type’ and will invariably take in ’11 men kicking a ball’ along the way. Lately Wayne Rooney’s IQ being in inverse proportion to his bank balance has been cropping up too.

My answer, however, is always roughly the same. I try to describe moments like Kaboul’s header or the final whistle on Saturday. That 90 minutes of total commitment culminating in an explosion of joyous abandon that is unparalleled in any sphere of life. Really: what else is there that is not chemically manufactured and leaves you floating carefree and with enough energy to power the National Grid for hours on end? Maybe seeing a band, although the personal involvement is probably not quite the same. The conversation finishes in a well-practiced manner. I fix them straight in the eye and say, ‘I feel sorry for people who don’t get football, because you’ll never experience this’.

There are other great emotions to savour too. The feeling when one of the players is burdened with the pressure of playing poorly yet at the very moment when he could sink without trace, rises to the challenge, when truly he becomes one of us. William Gallas’s magnificent defensive performance was unquestionably one such example. Early on he came from right to left with a perfectly timed tackle and one on one he had a good first half. In the second, however, our opponents discovered that they simply could not get past him. In the box and outside, time and again, impeccable timing rather than power meant he came away with the ball. His presence inspired Kaboul, who had another decent match as well as staking a small claim to history. Gallas’s legacy as a leader of a fine central defensive partnership could be more valuable than breaking the ‘top four away’ hoodoo.

The most astounding, mind-warping element was the absolute chutzpah of a win after playing like a team of Mr Blobbys for the first half. There was I at half-time, my sole ambition to keep it to four or five and feeling that this may be beyond us. The back four were all over the place. The Man in a Raincoat used to rope his back four together and make them play like that in training to drill into them the importance of staying close and working as unit. Our lot acted as if they had never met before and the Woolwich boys strolled through deserted open spaces as peacefully undisturbed as a lone trekker in the Gobi desert.

Nobody had much of a clue as to what they should be doing. Jenas, who had another good game, urged his team-mates upfield in the early minutes to press the opposition high up the pitch, but then a few of them thought, well, they weren’t up for that. Lennon and Bale again, too wide and not coming back to help.

Second half, do what we do best, attack. Bale has been accused in some quarters of being a one-trick pony but here’s evidence of his football nouse, coming off his wing with a diagonal run to slot home with the aplomb of a Chivers or a Greaves. And that one trick – it’s a damn good one. Repeatedly he was fouled, players taking it in turns so they did not get booked. Memo to Stoke, Blackburn and others – when Wenger goes on about kicking, wheel out this DVD, but they were not dirty (no irony there) – Bale was just too good.

Defoe didn’t do much in truth, but that header that began the move will do. The pundits were sputtering about how he could win that header but in fact it was a clever little ball, played in front of Defoe so the centre half could not reach it. Any higher and it would have been lost.

With Defoe spinning wide, their back four was suddenly stretched  and Modric, Bale and VDV piled into the gaps. Meanwhile, JJ showed admirable restraint and covered the back four. We dropped back to concede a few yards in the middle but crammed the space from 40 yards out. Bale and VDV tucked in when not in possession. Now our opponents were hesitant – we exposed their lack of resilience, as demonstrated by the best player on the pitch, Fabregas, acting like a little boy at nursery school with his silly handball. Talking of nursery tantrums, there’s so much fun to be had when Wenger lets that water bottle go. I can almost hear him saying ‘Ooohh Betty’ at the same time.

Astounding, audacious…enough now. A superb game culminating in the finest of victories. Unable to find the time over the weekend to write, I thought this would be out of date but in fact it’s the best time, because 48 hours on, I’m still grinning uncontrollably. It’s good to be a Spurs fan. It’s good to feel truly alive.

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to FurlAdd to Newsvine

Betrayal

/ Alan / 27 Comments

The significance of the north London derby in eyes of Spurs fans should never be underestimated but this week it has been totally overshadowed by a greater drama off the pitch. The future of the club is at stake, placed in jeopardy by the man who is supposed to act as its custodian.

Tottenham Hotspur’s interest in the Olympic Stadium had been largely dismissed as a bargaining chip to force the hand of planners first in Haringey and then, when permission was granted, in the Mayor’s Office. Many years of effort and considerable expense had resulted in a scheme for a sparkling new ground right next door to the Lane. It would never be the same but would run a close second, with emphasis on fan-friendly stands close to the pitch plus an ‘end’. When the hard-fought battle for planning consent was won, there was general satisfaction in the Spurs community.

In hindsight, perhaps we should have paid more attention to the warning signs. Close to the deadline, we declared an interest in the Olympic site in Stratford. ‘Declared an interest’. Doesn’t sound like much, just a sensible fall-back should there be further hitches, but the signs were there. Spurs were in bed with AEG, a powerful entertainment company not used to failure. A Spurs director, Keith Mills, is on the Olympic board, then, quietly a couple of weeks ago, we pinch another senior executive from an Olympic committee.

However, the biggest error was underestimating the business acumen of Daniel Levy. He may have twisted and turned when it came to decisions about football management but in business he’s cool, decisive and ruthless. The anxiety levels rose early this week with an article by Paul Kelso in the Telegraph. Because of a £50m increase in the WHL redevelopment, suddenly Spurs’ interest in Stratford was ‘deadly serious’. Kelso continues:

“Some people have said that the Olympic bid is just a means of getting leverage over Haringey, but the club is committed to running this process in parallel with that development. If they are successful in winning the bid for Stratford they will have to make a decision, but it is deadly serious,” said a source with direct knowledge of the deliberations.”

Kelso revealed that Spurs have hired Goldman Sachs as advisers. Now I am no financial expert as my bank manager will readily testify but even I know these people are going to charge more for opening a letter than I earn in a month. Serious indeed.

The Spurs plan is essentially the purchase of the site. We intend to knock down the stadium and rebuild afresh. Planning and transport issues would be a doddle compared the tortuous negotiations that are still proceeding in north London. The downside is the athletics legacy enshrined in the site, whereas the main rival bid from Newham Council and West Ham keeps the running track. However, our bid is reckoned to be far superior in terms of the financial structure, and we all know money talks.

Interestingly, AEG run the O2 arena, which lay dormant for years until all previous plans were thrown out the window so the company could create a giant and highly profitable entertainment complex from the place that was intended to be the nation’s millennium legacy. Perhaps an appropriate legacy for the times after all, but the point is, they managed it once and can do so again.

Then yesterday came a tweet from David Lammy, the Tottenham MP and a Spurs fan. A few hours after asking twitter for questions to put to levy, he emerged from the meeting with these few words:

“Devastated – Levy is serious about moving, not a bargaining chip at all”

Twitter is much maligned as a communication medium but it encourages a concise approach, witness his next message shortly afterwards:

“Decision based on what is cheaper – putting profit line before history, fans and community. Really devastated.”

That provoked a deluge of information that continues unabated but essentially that’s it, right there. Lammy himself has allegedly gone much further. He suggests that the site makes Spurs a better prospect if owner Joe Lewis wishes to sell it on in the near future, and that Boris Johnson is actively encouraging us. No wonder he’s delaying the N17 decision.

The Stratford option is a betrayal of our heritage and of the passion of the vast majority of Spurs fans. No amount of discussion about the merits of better access will outweigh the feeling of staying close to our roots. It’s 5 miles or so away but it may as well be in another country. That’s not our part of the world. It’s not Tottenham Hotspur.

Levy’s plan to build next the Lane is a triumph. I never thought we could emulate our north London neighbours by building a modern, spacious ground in our area, yet we are so close.

I’m aware there’s a lack of logic in this argument. I and other Spurs fans vehemently campaigning to stay in N17 are being disingenuous because we live miles away, and frankly would not choose to live in the area if we could possibly avoid it. Stratford would be much easier for me.

But logic has nothing to do with being a football fan. That’s the whole point – it’s about profound emotional attachment, belonging, being part of a culture that stretches back over 125 years. Tottenham is not just where we are, it’s who we are.

Like I say, money talks. Levy is accountable to the shareholders, not the fans. However, he would ignore us at his peril. Football is a business but clubs and their fans are more than mere commodities to be bought and sold. We need to make some noise, at games as well as outside. Confront Levy with a reaction that he can’t ignore. Remind him that whatever he likes to believe, he is accountable to us after all.

Reaction and protest is gaining pace. There’s a petition here: http://www.petitiononline.co.uk/petition/say-no-to-stratford-hotspur/434