Fulham v Spurs. Back to the Lane

So it’s back to the Lane next week, as I predicted in my preview. This in itself in unusual, getting something right in the preview that is, but there was always something about this fixture that screamed ‘draw’. Fulham are busy and well-organised but low scorers, Spurs more creative but since the four goals in the Cup we can’t quite do enough at the Cottage to score one more than them. And that’s the match summary, right there. We played well but lacked the cutting edge to make sufficient decent chances,  Fulham had less of the ball but kept Gomes moving around without having the sharpness in the box, where it counts.

Following Harry’s remarks earlier this week that we can’t play 4-5-1, Spurs duly lined up with Crouch and Pav up front in the absence of Defoe. The pattern of the game was drawn by Fulham withdrawing their midfield into an area 30 or 40 yards in front of their goal when we had possession. Willingly we came on to them and moved the ball around well for the most part, searching for an opening, although at times we could have done so more swiftly. Modric was prominent in the early stages and had a good game. He’s made for that central berth. Always trying to make himself available and able to pass both long and short, able to pass quickly or hold it as the situation demands, he’s never on the ball for any longer than is necessary. It was noticeable how seldom he was caught in possession, and for that matter the same can be said for his team-mates, a sure sign that the support for the man on the ball was good throughout the team.

Crouch also had a fine first half, although he faded later. Two reasons; one, he stayed close to his team-mates rather than isolating himself further upfield as he has done too often this season. Two: decent service. We played it up to him early, accurately and firmly. No aimless hoofs, Crouchie kept moving and responded in kind with quicker lay-offs. This blog has always said that he could play like this and has become increasingly irritated by his performances over the last few months, but there’s evidence here to show that the long ball may have been imposed upon the team tactically by the manager, worrying in itself but that seems to be history now so we’ll let that one go for the moment. TOMM doesn’t forget, however….now there’s a threat to set Harry twitching, just watch him next time he’s in the dugout, you’ll see what I mean….

One of the sub-plots of the match was the comparison between the two big centre-forwards. Earlier this season I was somewhat disparaging about Zamora in my preview of the corresponding league fixture but yesterday as time went on he came into the match as Crouch disappeared from view. He’s come to terms with his limitations and under Hodgson’s wise guidance has become an effective target man, determined with his back to goal and looking to come on to the ball in the box. His team work well around him and he provides that extra second or two that enables the Fulham midfield to get to him and turn defence into attack. He provided Bassong with a stern test but for the most part Seb did well. As with the Bolton centre forward in the replay, Bassong was determined not to let his man turn. It was a fine tussle, which also provided a nice piece of commentary (not sure I’ve ever written that sentence before in regard to ITV…). Beglin rightly enthused about Zamora’s surge and shot in the second half, talking about how he put it across the keeper. Clive came in, quietly and dryly: ‘It’s gone for a throw-in.’

And that sums up much of Fulham’s efforts in the box, they didn’t quite come off, but in the first half they seldom approached our area, let alone the goal. I’m a big fan of Roy Hodgson and he had prepared well. His midfield were prepared to concede possession but not space in front of their box. We had the ball but no room. So it became a series of almosts and might have beens as our attempts nearly came off but not quite. Also, Roy put two men on Bale, something that he had better get used to. It’s easier to mark him when he’s in midfield because he starts his runs from further up the pitch. At fullback he comes from deeper and so is more difficult to pick up. Also, he can move later in an attack when defenders are already more committed. Despite this he coped reasonably well and occupied two men. If Duff is back, his attacking prowess is blunted, whihc in turn releases pressure on us. Modric picked up on this and switched play regularly to the right. However, Corluka had a poor game. He became the spare man and was the main target but his distribution was inaccurate with a series of wasteful crosses and passes. This to me was a crucial element of the match, we failed to take advantage of the spare man and amount of ball on the right that we had worked hard to achieve.

Fulham steadfastly reused to budge. We prompted and probed but did not really get very far. Pav worked hard but did not get past the white-shirted barrier. His control let him down too often, especially in the area. Again, like the Corluka comments, this was a match that might have been won and lost on the tiniest margins, so this mattered.

The second half began much as the first had ended. Fulham livened up a bit but did not really look like the home team until they went 4-4-2 towards the end. They slid the ball inside and behind our full-backs and if Murphy had been playing, his shrewd passing might have been significant. We were defending well and I wondered if this could give us the room to hit them on the break but it was not to be. Our solidity was due to in large part to Palacios’ determined sentry duty in front of our back four. He refused to budge, something that I’ve advocated throughout the season and again in the preview, and his disciplined performance was justifiably rewarded with a MOM award. He repeatedly broke up the Fulham movements and knocked it out to a better placed colleague. This strength enabled Modric and Krancjar to play their more creative game (I was pleased with Niko’s work-rate too) and really gives the team shape.

Other bits and pieces: BAE was quietly efficient, his brainstorm clearance in the second half aside. He just gets on with it, and I like it. We failed to capitalise on the corners because of bad delivery, and the same can be said for the long throws – Bale can do it so can’t we have a system to profit from it, as Stoke do, rather than have a loose informal gathering in the box as is the case now.

We have a great chance for a cup semi-final in the replay. We could have won it yesterday with more punch up front but on the whole a decent performance, credit Fulham with being an effective team in their chosen role.

Finally, a moan. The warm and respectful gesture to wear black armbands in memory of Keith Alexander was tainted by our use of black shiny gaffer tape. It smacks of hasty preparation. We should have put more into that – how long would it have taken to run something proper up, as our opponents managed.

10 thoughts on “Fulham v Spurs. Back to the Lane

  1. Good write up as usual. For some reason its hard to hate Fulham and I thought they were quite good – but I was disappointed by our failure to get forward direction, it was all tidy and well connected but never seemed to have the urgency of a cup tie (except for a brief spell in 2nd half). Not sure I agree totally about Modric – there seemed to be a few wasteful wayward passes. Bale was our most threatening player (again).


  2. You know Bale always amazes me at how adept he is at digging out a cross from the byline when for sure it looks as though he has nil room for movement,but this for me is a prelude of greater things to come from the lad,yet he most definitely brings more to the fore with those surging runs from full back as the opposition can’t spare the men to cover his positioning when he arrives later,three defenders I counted on him at times and he still managed to get into the box.

    As for Palacios what can I say a man mountain of a performance and a definite pot of gold overflowing with jewels of learning for Livermore to gather up should he wish,which after seeing him in pre season and hearing him speak I’m sure he will.

    Modric though looked a little lost for me at times,now we all know he’s a fantastic player so no matter what position he plays in you will always receive good movement and passing from him,and perhaps it was as you say the fact that Fulham’s midfield played a lot closer to their defensive line,so in turn cutting out the space to play through them,however,Modders always seems to offer a more pro-active part to our game when he occupies that left wing berth giving him a more sneaky role where he doesn’t have to worry about leaving a hole in midfield.

    I also think we need more pace on the right to complement Gareth,and in Walker I feel we have the perfect solution for this position the trouble being will Harry take the risk?who knows but if we continue as we started yesterday I have no fear about our overcoming Roy’s Fulham and whats more attaining that top four berth.


    • EW, Modric would be great in an effective 4-5-1 but we don’t have the right players for that at the club. To score enough goals to succeed with this, you need a top quality centre forward who can score, lay it off and work for the team, plus midfielders who can consistently make runs past the centre forward into the box and score their fair share.

      What do you think?




      • Agreed. Our problem seems to be a lack of consistency up front. JD is great and all, but there is no way he would be effective in the 4-5-1 formation. Do you think Berbatov (had he stuck around) could have been enough to attempt that formation?



  3. Palacios seemed to play with a bit more caution now that he is on 9 yellows (8 league; 1cup) and was none the worse for it. Thats two games he’s got through, will he manage the rest of the season? Somehow I don’t think so.

    Good full report. I see that you mention corners. In our 35 odd games this season I reckon wev’e had well over a hundred corners (9 again on Sat.)and wev’e scored very few goals from them. Do you have access to any stats. on this?


    • I’m not very good on numbers. Not sure they really reach the heart of what happens in a football match. Except when the stats fit my arguments, of course.

      I will have some access to stats in a couple of weeks – now that’s going to keep the hits high, eh? Talk about building the tension. If I dig anything out, I’ll let you know.




    • Palacios was at his best playing with caution. A bit of a contradiction if you ask me. Will it last throughout the season? Doubtful.


Comments welcome, thanks for dropping in

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s