Not All About the Clattenburg Clanger

Let’s do it then. 93 minutes of a fascinating and, for lengthy periods, pulsating match at Old Trafford can be dismissed because only 60-odd seconds really matter, or so you would think if you followed the media this weekend. You want more, don’t you, there’s not been enough about it.

It’s a while since I’ve seen so much go wrong in such a short space of time. Kaboul was fortunate to get away with the foul on Nani, then the winger took the most definite hold of a ball since Michael Johnson’s last basket but the turning point comes a few seconds later. Clattenburg’s decisive signal that he was denying the penalty appeal was not matched with a similar sign indicating advantage. Where Gomes placed the ball is irrelevant: all keepers pinch a good few yards if there is a free-kick close to the byline. Also, the ref could easily have thought our keeper was about to shift the ball upfield quickly. Then, Gomes hesitates, he knows something is not right. Scoles and other United players are urging Nani to get over his childish sulk and get on with it. Gomes looks to the ref, hands forward, and is met with a shrug. Up to you, old son, the ball’s in play.

The linesman’s late flag was reasonable. He had every right to assume the ref knew what he was doing but just in case, he wanted to tell him about the handball. There was an interesting discussion about refs on 5 Live last night. Some refs tell their linesmen not to flag for a foul if the ref is in their quadrant. I bet Clattenburg falls into this category. He likes to be in charge and be seen to be in charge. Linesman says handball, ref says I know. If the referee allowed Ferdinand to join in because he just can’t be arsed once again to tell players to shut up and go away for the zillionth time in a match, I might have a little sympathy, as players haranguing refs drives me bananas. But for a guy who wants to be in charge, it was a sign of fatal weakness. At least it offered further evidence of what a dipstick Ferdy is, abusing the linesman even after it’s gone his way. Not like our lovely nice boys – the stream I watched replayed pictures and sounds of the Spurs players around the ref at full-time and not a swear word to be heard. So sweet.

I don’t want to defend the ref – he did not deal with this well – but in the end, play to the whistle is an adage drummed into the youngest schoolboy and I presume it’s the same in Brazil. This season, referees are allowing more advantage and they do bring the ball back if none is gained. Clattenburg could have done so here, as Nani advanced towards the ball. If the FA followed rugby’s example and issued clear guidance to referees to permit a few more seconds for the advantage to pan out, football would be a better game. I remember saying that when I was a schoolboy, too.

Gomes was daft but I feel for him. This bizarre episode will be endlessly replayed over those blooper reels, with ill-informed D-list celebs ripping the piss out of our keeper to get a cheap laugh, and I don’t want that to happen because it’s so undeserved. He’s a fine keeper who had an excellent match. Often exposed by wayward marking in front of him, he was a redoubtable last line of defence.

Now we have Harry banging on about it, including in the Sun, where he just happens to have a contract and column. He seemed philosophical at full-time, chuckling away ruefully with Fergie. If the pressure on him to comment leads to a touchline ban, he’s more stupid than the ref.

Enough already. I’m curious as to why this one incident has occupied so much attention in the media this weekend.  Sure, it’s crazy in itself, let alone in a top of the table Premier League clash, but the coverage has been way over to the top. It’s not as if the match hinged on this one moment. It snuffed out our final desperate efforts to seek an equaliser but we were a goal down and flagging. To me, it’s symptomatic of one of the most harmful aspects of the modern media coverage of our great game. It is reduced into micro-moments. ‘Let’s have a look at those penalty appeals’ and the TV pundits snuggle up to replays of 37 angles before pronouncing that they’ve seen those given. Football is about the ebb and flow over time, territory fought over, assaults repulsed and swift counters, all balance and guile, sweat and toil. On Saturday, the first half in particular was a pulsating advert for the much maligned Premier League, full of open, flowing and skillful attacking football. It’s like nobody bothers about that any more.

Also, from Spurs’ point of view, the Clattenburg Clanger is a convenient smokescreen to mask the limitations of our play. Harry doesn’t want to get into this, and neither does the media, because it doesn’t fit their current perception of our team.  We are getting great publicity: our squad strength is praised consistently, rightly so, and our attacking football has won friends, especially in the Champions League, where if you want goals, choose the Tottenham Hotspur option on the red button. However, take a closer look, as we fans do, and there are a couple of problems that are not going away as the season goes on.

There are genuine positives to take from the match, especially the way in which we took the game to United in the second half. It’s not much, but we forced our opponents back for lengthy periods, holding possesion and probing for the gaps. We compelled them into making changes to bolster their defensive shield, and it’s a while since you could say that about a Spurs performance at Old Trafford. Van der Vaart was again brilliant in the first half. His turn and shot utterly breathtaking. Modric took a greater part in the second half, showing how well he can perform. We were not strong up front but at least we made some chances.

But there we are, what’s going on upfront. Not much. Keane’s selection was a brave one. He played well in that role in preseason and in theory it means we could keep it on the ground. However, he was largely anonymous, so it was left to VDV to provide the punch. Pav did well enough when he came on but there’s no disguising the lack of threat from our strikers, whoever plays there.

At the back, we were far too open. If United had not been so unusually wasteful, we could have been three down by half time. I’m always talking about how the midfield fail to protect our back four, so I won’t bang on about it again. Suffice to say, Superboy may appear invulnerable but in the end he’s human too. He has to get goalside and do his fair share of defending. Too often on Saturday he was drifting in no-man’s-land, 5 or 10 yards outside our box as United got in behind us. Same goes for Lennon and Modric to some extent. I don’t wish to be over-critical of these excellent players – but they have to do it and it is holding us back because it leaves us vulnerable.

Kaboul did well once again, a fine prospect, but part of his particular learning curve is when to get in tight and when to bounce back a fraction. Against Everton and on Saturday, unnecessary free-kicks led to goals. On Saturday the error was compounded by downright useless marking in the box. It was criminal to leave Vidic with so much space. Our injuries at the back are beginning to make me maudlin. If only. If only Daws and Led were fit. If only Woody could have come back…it means so much, and could mean real might-have-beens come the end of the season.

5 thoughts on “Not All About the Clattenburg Clanger

  1. nice article mate, but if Harry needs to take a touchline ban then that’s what he should do. Are you telling me if it was the other way round, or Arsenal/Chelsea, even Liverpool they wouldnt be going absolutely crazy? you have to have a winning mentality and not just accept these things as bad luck. what happened on saturday was a disgrace, id be calling for that ref never to be relegated to the championship.


  2. Referees are taught to give free kicks for handball and to make clear what their decisions are

    But it’s just easier to go with the biased media and paint Gomes as the villain instead of as the victim that he is.


  3. It just goes to show you what a waste of time these ‘expert’ pundits are. It’s as though they can’t think for themselves so take the easy way out by endlessly repeating tired clichés or beliefs that weren’t even half truths in the first place.

    Like you say, for them, the game is simply broken down into goals and controversies. Small picture bites if you like, which then enables their ‘expert’ minds to form an ‘expert’ opinion of the whole. These pundits then talk and listen among each over, giving and taking more untruths which build like a wave through other media outlets until the less initiated of us believe it to be gospel.

    As for the game – mostly the same predictable wing play with no one to bang it in the net, and a referee to stubborn to use common sense.


  4. If VDV is injured for a while, I’m starting to think Harry should go back to 442. Clearly the team is more comfortable playing that way and two average strikers up front might supply more chances. I even saw a suggestion on a site somewhere that Kranjcar could be given a chance to play as a striker given his lack of opportunities elsewhere. He can’t be slower than Pav or Crouch and clearly has an eye for goal.

    As for this match, I actually thought spurs did well considering the lineup. The middle of the field was a bit light in my opinion. VDV and Modric are not physically big players and the absence of Hudd was clearly felt. Too bad it was JJ’s worst match of the season so far, just when I was thinking it was getting some consistency. More fool me. Should have started with Palacios. When he came on he had maybe his *best* 35 minutes on the pitch this season. Hopefully Sandro keeps coming along. The decision not to splurge on a striker and backup central defender this summer is really coming back to haunt us.


  5. The only surprise to me about this episode is that it took so long into the game to happen. We are ALWAYS playing the ref at Old trafford, if you look at the litany of injustices we have had there – the Mendes ‘goal’ (Clattenberg AGAIN), The Vidic non-handball and red card, the Howard Webb penalty, and now this.

    Another thing. When Clattenberg was talking to his assistant he waved the Spurs players away, but allowed Ferdinand to stay. Why? Oh yeah, because he’s a UTD player, that’s why. But when our captain Modric approached him after the award of the goal to represent his team, as he is entitled to do, he was yellow carded. So Ferdinand is part of that decision making conversation and Modric was not. Was Rio even captain on Saturday??? If he was then Luca should have been given equal rights to his say – if he wasn’t, what the hell was Ferdinand doing there at all??? That alone shows that refs are scared of Utd and cannot handle the pressure to officiate games fairly. Don’t agree? Ask Stoke fans why Gary Neville was not sent off last weekend.

    It’s a farce, there is no level playing field, and it is ruining football in my opinion. Man Utd are good enough without having refs CHEAT for them!


Comments welcome, thanks for dropping in

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s