Chronic Ingrained Underachieving – It’s the Spurs Way

The Spurs Way. Attacking football on the front foot. Played with style and a flourish, not sitting back waiting for the others to die of boredom. It’s a familiar precept for Spurs fans that invests meaning and purpose in our passion.

We all need something like this, if only because watching 22 players kick a ball around is essentially hollow and futile without it. It’s been important for Spurs fans in my lifetime, initially because it characterised our approach to the game and latterly as an ambition to cherish during long periods of mediocrity.

It’s live – Tuesday night, first half, centre circle, Bissouma in space, opts to pass back. Hardly the most serious error in a season filled with catastrophe but the South Stand roared in anger. Thomas Frank, all season, doesn’t get it, can’t handle it, out of his depth to the point where even our board can see it. Out the door 6 weeks too late.

I believe in the Spurs Way but realise it has another function in masking the reality of a parallel truth, that Tottenham in modern times are a club with a history of failure, embedded in poor organisation and owners bereft of the capacity to efficiently and effectively run the club. Sum up the last forty years in a couple of pithy phrases: missed opportunities and unfilled potential. There are three fundamental elements to running a successful football club at any level: the coach or manager, recruitment and finance. Those in charge have never consistently shown the will, ambition, structure or capacity that enables this triumvirate to function smoothly together, united in direction and resolve. In short, this is who we are, and this is why we have ended up in the damned mess we are in, near the bottom of the table and staring at the abyss below.

This dates back to the early 1980s, when the club under chairman Irving Scholar put themselves in the vanguard of a new commercialism. The drive to maximise income, in Spurs’ case through floating on the Stock Exchange, non-football manufacturing, the new West Stand with executive boxes, merchandising and television advertising, was intended to generate funds for transfers and wages. In fact, it had two related consequences, in that the expenditure incurred led to mounting debts, so increasing income became an end in itself for club survival.

Keith Burkinshaw’s wonderful team sustained and entertained us into the middle of the decade. Scholar’s predecessors, the Wale family, were perceived as amongst the fusty blazers holding back the development of the game in England, out of touch and highly protective of their own status. Yet their old-school approach led to Burkinshaw’s promotion within the club and allowed him several years following relegation to rebuild, with money spent firstly on the midfield with Ossie and Ricky, then later up front with Crooks and Archibald. Burkinshaw’s famous passing shot ‘there used to be a football club over there’ was probably written by a journalist but it accurately expressed his views, seen here in this post-match interview from 1982 where this normally taciturn man, complete with de rigueur managerial sheepskin, calmly articulates the problems of the contemporary English game, truly ahead of his time.

The warning signs slowly became apparent. Off the pitch, executive boxes displaced the mighty Shelf, while on the field, the skilful teams built by Pleat then Venables began to take shape only for stars to be sold and replaced with frankly inferior footballers. We build again only for the cycle to be repeated. Stars like Sheringham and Klinsmann were never supported by a squad of sufficient talent, or as Colin Calderwood famously put it, “we’ve got the Famous Five [attackers], what about the shit six?”

Sugar, then Levy and ENIC, but the same pattern. The choice of manager unsuited to the club and in many cases to the task as well. Managers never adequately supported in the transfer market. Promises made to fans as the prices went up that were never kept. Pochettino is the outlier in terms of his suitability but the board’s failure to fully support him in the market remains an era-defining error.

And here we are again. New board, new supposedly vaunted backroom staff, same old problems. The search for a manager last summer produced a man unsuited to the club in so many ways, leaving the bloke out of his depth and no intention of throwing him a lifebelt. He’s gone now, but not for the first time, I’m left to ask the question, what were those in charge of the club seeing when Spurs played? Apparently not the shapeless, tactically deficient football we all saw. What in Frank’s approach did they see that gave them cause to believe he could turn things around when we fans saw nothing of the sort? Why wait this long – do they have access to another Premier League table in a parallel universe, because their inaction is that absurd.

Lange in charge of recruitment knows his up and coming players but we needed some experience too. He says they didn’t want a quick fix. Except we need a quick fix. And if we can’t get our top targets, where is the list of players next in line, and where is the sense that we recruit to fill gaps and create a coherent team rather than be opportunistic?

Ventkatesham schmoozes the fans at a meeting and writes some corporate rubbish in the programme. He says the culture needs to change, right, but he needs to start that, because that’s his job. And where has the £150m funding injection from the board gone? Not on players, because we sold our top goalscorer in order to fund Gallagher’s purchase.

Spurs are sleepwalking towards relegation. Lousy form, shattered confidence, no structure. I hear that the squad is more than capable of staying up. It is, except half of them are injured. Players who thought they would be competing for honours are not ready for a relegation fight. The current hierarchy is riven with complacency. It could spell disaster.

As I write, Spurs have appointed Igor Tudor as a temp until the end of the season. Good luck – he has my best wishes. I only know what you know after your frantic googling, same as me. I quote Wikipedia: “On 13 February 2026, Tudor agreed a deal to become Tottenham interim head coach until they get relegated from the premier league in the 2025/26 season.” David Ornstein, a reliable source, says that the process was led by Ventkatesham and Lange. That does not fill me with confidence.

On Tuesday night, the booing at full-time was full of righteous fury. What received less attention, but is just as telling, was that as many fans, if not more, shrugged and wandered silently home. Perhaps I’m over-interpreting, but I’ve seldom heard as many non-football conversations going on around me during and after a game, given that stakes were high and despite being excruciatingly bad, we were never more than a goal down. Injury time, ball in their box, there was no excitement in the stands, no tension or jeopardy, and for the first time this season, the players looked utterly dejected as yet another aimless cross went weakly by.

This has been going on for years and we are drained of enthusiasm. Watching Spurs is joyless. It’s the ultimate criticism as far as we fans go. If Spurs can stagger through to the end of the season and avoid relegation, that’s all I care about. But the long-term problems are structural and chronic, and they won’t go away.

8 thoughts on “Chronic Ingrained Underachieving – It’s the Spurs Way

  1. A bit of a rewrite of history. I actually think Burkenshaw was the third best manager in Spurs history (after the two that won the league title). But the fact our third best manager was incapable of winning a league title tells you the sorry story. Scholar was bad news but to pretend it was sweetness and light before his arrival is just wrong.

    Like

  2. The whole club stinks from top to bottom. Until we have a proper board and proper owners we will never be anything. We are a global laughing stock. Built a shinny new mansion and decorated it with ikea furniture. Our owners are liars. Does Lewis really care?? We get relegated they raise 500m on player sales. They will cover the financial hit.

    Mikey moore, souza, danso about to become our fav players…..

    Sad sad times…

    Like

  3. I totally agree with your feelings the club has drifted aimlessly for years with false promises, I would have given Ange the 8 months that Frank had to see how things went, the Lewis don’t want footballing success if they did they would have gone out and bought top grade players and showed their intent but no all they want is the money coming in from other sources they’ve never replaced Kane/Sonny adequately and I’m afraid this squad will not keep us up also teams with a losing mentality love to play Tottenham , Romero isn’t good enough to be captain and his discipline is a liability for his team mates I hope we manage to stay up but unfortunately I cannot see it happening

    COYS

    Gray 78

    Like

  4. Well said – hopefully the drop can be avoided and thereafter the true test of the new regime will be the willingness/ability to meaningfully address the underlying issues.

    Like

  5. I don’t watch games live anymore on tv here in Canada. I wait to see the score and then decide if it’s worth my time. That’s sad after 66 years of support.

    Like

  6. No More, Mr. Nice Guy, as Alice Cooper would have it. There was no justifiable reason to prolong Frank’s torment (and ours). And even though he suffered cruel luck with injuries he was still fielding a team with seven, eight, nine internationals each week. There was enough talent on display to deliver decent results – but when the players have given up on you and can’t be bothered then it’s time to go.

    Ange’s comments this week were revealing. Admittedly we have to separate the cream from the self aggrandising insights but he confirms the fragility of the entire structure even to the point where defeats were accepted if the right excuses could be found. As you mention, Alan, the core of the club is rotten and when Lange and Venkatetc failed to back Frank (and the team) with added backbone in January then that fragility reappears.

    Is this leadership group fit for purpose?

    At the moment I am numb to the news that Tudor has got the nod. Interestingly very little has been made of Frank getting the team to 4th in the Champions League table (!) and the leadership (sic) must be wanting someone who has sniffed that rareified air along with building some sense of team spirit along the way. But he comes in with just 12 games to go and it feels more of a gamble than an inspired appointment. The last thing we need is another gamble. But if he can cobble together 15 points out of the remainder of the season then we should be okay. (What an ambition!)

    My last impression is of having a mental picture of a circus clown car pulling up outside the stadium and sundry idiots getting out and falling over each other as they stagger and tumble towards to the entrance. Say hello to the board of directors..

    It’s just dawned on me that No More, Mr. Nice Guy was lifted from the album ‘Billion Dollar Babies’. ‘Nuff said.

    Eaststander.

    Liked by 1 person

  7. Igor. How appropriate given the Frankenstein’s monster that we’ve become. Our team is bits from previous eras stitched together to try and make a functioning body. Partly why we’re so disjointed – no manager has remained in post long enough for a team to become entirely his with players bought for his system. Our recruitment’s been consistently dire, anyway.

    I don’t want to turn into one of those Ange disciples that still claim he was a good manager, but I simply don’t agree with much of the discourse around Frank. Particularly the utter nonsense that he was out of his depth. Hello years of success at Brentford. Hello acceptable performances in the Champions League. I’m bored of all the Tottenham way, glory glory expectation. We haven’t played like that since Poch and we haven’t had a team good enough to play like that since Poch. You can’t expect a Robin Reliant to perform like a Ferrari.

    Frank inherited a mediocre team, with a second-rate leadership group, that was beset by injuries, and was attempting to compete across multiple competitions with no squad depth. Was the football good enough? No. Was this surprising? No. Was this down to Frank? I can’t be arsed to cite the stats or comparisons with Ange. Let’s just say I think Frank performed about what could be expected of him, give or take. We’ll see if sacking him keeps us up, but it seems a risky decision. All we’ve done is lose a manager just starting to familiarise himself with the players, and replaced him with an interim with no Premiership experience and no knowledge of the players. I hope the coaches that remain will give him the support he’ll need.

    I’m wary of the fanbase clamour for Poch 2.0. Don’t get me wrong I love the man and actually stopped being a season ticket holder after he was knifed by Levy, because I was so hacked off with the way the club treated him and its lack of investment in a proven manager and team that had played such wonderful football. But Poch inherited a good side with some superstars in the making that he helped to develop. If he comes into this shit-show with our same recruitment strategy of not-quite-good-enoughs or ‘prospects’, he will not turn us around. Personally I don’t think it’s ever a good idea to rekindle an old romance.

    Like

Leave a reply to Anonymous Cancel reply